The emerging field of multispecies research brings diverse bodies of knowledge into conversation to explore a lively world in which animals, plants, people and things bring one another into being (Ogden et al., 2013). Unsettling a given notion of species, multispecies inquiries develop new sensitivities and attunements to entangled relations and coevolutionary histories that go beyond the common dialogic focus (such as human-animal). “Species are always multiple, multiplying their forms and associations. It is this coming together of questions of kinds and their multiplicities that characterizes multispecies studies.” (van Dooren et al., 2016, p. 1). The dynamics in focus “include, but always also exceed, dynamics of predator and prey, parasite and host, researcher and researched, symbiotic partner, or indifferent neighbor” (ibid., p. 3).
Multispecies research approaches are often characterized as “modes of immersion” or arts of attentiveness. They involve attunement to the exchange and emergence of meanings in webs of signification that might be linguistic, gestural, biochemical, and more. Simultaneously with attending to multispecies assemblages, questions gather around the human subject and the ways in which human lives, lifeways, and accountabilities are folded in more-than-human entanglements. The long histories of relational, agentic thinking from indigenous peoples are also informing multispecies research.
The “vast chorus of voices and temporalities” (Hillman, 2011) of the multispecies world highlights the need to question human mastery and pushes qualitative inquiry in new directions. The issue at stake is not simply to replace a focal animal with a plant or bacterium, or include other than human beings as extensions to frameworks that fundamentally remain the same. As Pedersen and Pini (2017) point out, these kinds of solutions only reproduce and maintain the human-centric thinking habits (temporal, ontological, epistemological) leaving much of the specifics and variation inside and across species categories as well as animate/inanimate boundaries intact.
This workshop engages with questions such as:
This workshop engages with questions such as:
References
Van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., & Münster, U. (2016). Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness.
Hillman, B. (2011). Engagements with light. Northwest Review, 49(2), 47-50.
Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and society, 4(1), 5-24.
Pedersen, H., & Pini, B. (2017). Educational epistemologies and methods in a more-than-human world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1051-1054.
Tsing, A. (2012). Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species: for Donna Haraway. Environmental humanities, 1(1), 141-154.
Workshop Facilitator
Dr Rikka Hohti I have published on topics such as animal relations, feminist care ethics, the Anthropocene, affective atmospheres, and materiality and temporality in classrooms. As an ethnographer, I have always had an interest in developing situated and creative multispecies and post-qualitative research approaches. The overall goal of my work is to rethink education, sustainability and childhoods from a critical-hopeful more-than-human perspective. Currently, I work as Associate Professor of Education, Ethics and Sustainable futures in the University of Helsinki. leading two research projects: Children of the Anthropocene (Antroposeenin lapset, Kone Foundation 2022-2025) and Figurations of the child and more than human politics of childhood for the post-Anthropocene: The fossil, the microbe, the weather (Research Council of Finland 2023-2027).